Fantasy points per target analysis Top 30 2016 WRs

Wiki Article

Fantasy points per target analysis: Top 30 2016 WRs Published: Mar 30, 2017 at 04:31 AM Michael Fabiano football is all about points. The more you score, the better chance you have to win. (It ain't rocket science, folks). While traditional scoring leader lists offer a look at how well a player did overall during a given season, it doesn't take into effect such factors as games mi sed and injuries. So, let's take a deeper look into the numbers to see how our heroes performed when the football was in their hands. In the case of the wide receivers, we examined how well players performed on a per target basis with notes on snap percentage as well. This exercise helps us find which wideouts did the most with their opportunities to produce points, and which ones needed lots of chances to be relevant. Khris Middleton Jersey Here's a look at your top 30 fantasy wide receivers from last season, ranked based on their fantasy-point-per-target averages (minimum 350 snaps). 1. , (1.66 FPPT): Hill's rank shouldn't be a surprise when you consider his targets (83) to the number of touchdowns he scored (nine) last season. Therein lies the concern in Hill's stock for 2017, as he'll be hard-pre sed to duplicate that high ratio once again. 2. , (1.56 FPPT): Stills finished 27th in fantasy points among wideouts a season ago. However, he scored nine touchdowns despite ranking third in targets (80) on his own team. In all, he was 60th in targets at his position. Kenny is "still" worth just a late pick. 3. , (1.44 FPPT): Cooks was 24th in targets among wideouts ( had more), but he made lots of statistical noise when he touched the football in New Orleans. This is positive news, considering his targets could decline as a member of the . T-4. , (1.42 FPPT): Adams ranked seventh in fantasy points at the position on the strength of his 12 touchdowns, which tied for the third most. A regre sion to the mean is an obvious concern for Adams' 2017 draft value, as is the addition of . T-4. , (1.42 FPPT): Nelson was 68th in targets and played in just 43 percent of Arizona's snaps, but he found the end zone seven times (once as a runner) despite the number of chances he received. There's some definite sleeper appeal with Nelson for next season. T-6. , (1.37 FPPT): Jones finished with 129 targets (9.2 per game), but remember that he mi sed time due to a bum foot. He also had another impre sive Greg Monroe Jersey stat, finishing second among qualified wide receivers in fantasy points per snap (0.25). Jones is a first-round lock. T-6. , (1.37 FPPT): Lots of touchdowns means a high point-per-target percentage, so it's no surprise to see Nelson (14 TDs) in the top 10 at the position. The veteran wide receiver saw 93 percent of his team's snaps and was sixth in targets among all wideouts. T-6. , (1.37 FPPT): Thielen was second in snap percentage (75) and targets (91) behind in Minnesota last season, but he was far more productive with the ball in his hands. Of course, 26 percent of his fantasy points came in just one game (Week 16). 9. , (1.36 FPPT): Matthews was an impre sive 14th in points (including nine touchdowns) among wideouts in 2016, but 30 players had more targets at the position. He did find the end zone on eight percent of his targets ... can John Henson Jersey he sustain that rate again? T-10. , (1.35 FPPT): Bryant had a "down" season based on his high standards, but he did score a touchdown on eight percent of his targets with at the helm. If he's on the field for 16 games, Bryant will be back in the top 10 among wide receivers. This article has been reproduced in a new format and may be mi sing content or contain faulty links. Please use the Contact Us link in our site footer to report an i sue.
https://arthurbwnz59269.wikiannouncement.com/6693032/2023_masters_winner_jon_rahm_almost_got_jinxed_by_an_nfl_star_and_j_j_watt_has_the_text_receipts_to_prove_it
Click here Click here